Traditionally, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been the go-to model for tasks in image recognition due to their ability to capture spatial hierarchies and patterns in image data. However, this paper proposes a different approach by adapting the Transformer architecture, which has seen great success in NLP, for image recognition tasks.
This paper seeks to address the crucial inquiry: Are Transformer models, renowned for their success in natural language tasks, equally capable and efficient when applied to image recognition a field where Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been the standard? Moreover, can the attention mechanism, typically limited to the final stages within CNNs, be fully integrated throughout all layers of Vision Transformers (ViTs) to effectively harness the global interrelations between image components? to capture the global dependencies between them.
The core idea of the paper is encapsulated in its title, "Image is Worth 16x16 Words". Here, the authors draw a parallel between words in NLP and image patches. The paper suggests treating each 16x16 pixel patch of an image as an analogous entity to a word in a sentence. These patches are then processed through a series of Transformer blocks (similar to those used in NLP models like BERT or GPT) to capture the global dependencies between them.
The paper "An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale" is a significant work in the field of computer vision and machine learning. It was authored by a team of researchers at Google Research, including Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. This group of authors is notable for their contributions to the advancement of machine learning and deep learning technologies, particularly at Google, which is a leading organization in AI research. Many of these authors have a strong background in developing innovative AI models and have contributed to numerous influential research papers in the field. Their work, including the development of the Vision Transformer (ViT) model as presented in this paper, has had a substantial impact on the way we understand and implement image recognition tasks using deep learning. Their collective expertise spans across various aspects of AI, including natural language processing, computer vision, and neural network architecture design, making them a highly regarded team in the AI research community.
Author | Details |
![]() Alexey Dosovitsky |
Alexey Dosovitsky is a Staff Research Scientist at Google, previously a Research Scientist at Intel Labs, and has worked as an AI engineer. He was a Deep Learning Intern at Google and focuses on Neural Networks, Computer Vision, and Unsupervised Machine Learning. Alexey Dosovitsky's research work has been cited 65958 times. |
![]() Lucas Beyer |
Lucas Beyer is a Staff Research Engineer at Google Brain, with prior experience as a Research Assistant at RWTH Aachen University. He has also worked as an AI engineer and Deep Learning Intern at Google, specializing in Deep Representation Learning. Lucas Beyer's research work has been cited 37085 times. |
![]() Alexander A Kolesnikov |
Alexander A Kolesnikov is a Research Scientist at Google Deepmind. He holds a Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics from the Institute of Science and Technology Austria, with interests in AI, Machine Intelligence, and Machine Perception. Alexander A Kolesnikov's research work has been cited 38391 times. |
![]() Dirk Weissenborn |
Dirk Weissenborn is part of the technical staff at Inceptive and a Research Scientist at Google. He earned his Master's in Computer Science from the Technical University of Dresden and is interested in building biological software and AI. Dirk Weissenborn's research work has been cited 28603 times. |
![]() Xiaohua Zhai |
Xiaohua Zhai is a Senior Staff Researcher at Google, previously a software engineer. He has a Ph.D. in Electronics and Computer Science from Peking University, focusing on Self-Supervised Learning, Representation Learning, Generative AI, and Transfer Learning. Xiaohua Zhai's research work has been cited 35471 times. |
![]() Thomas Unterthiner |
Thomas Unterthiner is a Research Scientist at the Google Brain Team, with interests in Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Neural Networks, and Bioinformatics. Thomas Unterthiner's research work has been cited 51478 times. |
![]() Mostafa Dehghani |
Mostafa Dehghani is a Research Scientist at Google and has also worked with Apple. His research interests include Machine Learning and Deep Learning. Mostafa Dehghani's research work has been cited 33614 times. |
![]() Matthias Minderer |
Matthias Minderer is a Senior Research Scientist at Google. He completed his Ph.D. in Neuroscience at Harvard University and a Master's Degree at ETH Zurich. His fields of interest include Representation Learning, Unsupervised Learning, Object Detection, and Vision-Language Models. Matthias Minderer's research work has been cited 27314 times. |
![]() Georg Heigold |
Georg Heigold is a Research Scientist at Google Inc. He holds a Diploma in Physics from ETH Zurich and has worked as a Software Engineer. His interests include Speech Recognition and Machine Learning. Georg Heigold's research work has been cited 33383 times. |
![]() Sylvain Gelly |
Sylvain Gelly leads the Google Brain Zurich team as a Deep Learning Researcher. He has previously worked as a Software Engineer and specializes in Neural Networks, Computer Vision, and Unsupervised Machine Learning. Neil Houlsby's research work has been cited 41314 times. |
![]() Jakob Uszkoreit |
Jakob Uszkoreit is the CEO and Co-founder of Inceptive and a Senior Staff Software Engineer at Google. He has worked at Acrolinx and has interned at Google. His interests lie in learning life's languages through deep learning. Jakob Uszkoreit's research work has the highest number of citations with a count of 144900. |
![]() Neil Houlsby |
Neil Houlsby is a Staff Research Scientist at Google. He completed his Ph.D. and M.Eng at the University of Cambridge and is interested in AI/ML, Computer Vision, and NLP. Neil Houlsby's research work has been cited 37,840 times. |
While CNNs [1] are adept at capturing hierarchical features, their fixed-size receptive fields may struggle with capturing fine-grained details or handling variations in object scales. Additionally, weight sharing, while beneficial for translation invariance, can be limiting when dealing with more complex spatial relationships. The application of attention mechanisms in the last few layers introduces computational overhead, potentially making the model more resource intensive. Moreover, attention mechanisms might not effectively capture long-range dependencies, hindering their ability to understand global context in larger images. In certain cases, CNNs with attention may suffer from interpretability issues, making it challenging to understand and trust the decision-making process. Despite their successes, addressing these cons remains an ongoing area of research in the field of computer vision.
Residual Neural Networks (ResNets) [2] improve upon traditional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) by addressing the challenge of vanishing gradients during deep network training. ResNets introduce residual connections, allowing information to bypass certain layers and be directly transmitted to subsequent layers. This mitigates the degradation problem, enabling the training of exceedingly deep networks. ResNets excel in capturing intricate features and hierarchical representations, making them well-suited for complex image processing tasks. This architectural innovation has proven to be instrumental in achieving state-of-the-art performance in various computer vision tasks [3], surpassing the depth limitations of conventional CNNs and enhancing the overall efficiency and accuracy of deep learning models for image analysis.
Detection Transformers, such as the popular models like DETR (DEtection TRansformer), represent a paradigm shift in object detection compared to traditional methods like CNN-based approaches. Detection Transformers leverage the Transformer architecture, originally designed for sequence-to-sequence tasks, to directly predict object instances in an image. They replace the conventional anchor-based methods with a set-based prediction approach, where each object is considered independently. This eliminates the need for predefined anchor boxes and improves adaptability to different object scales and aspect ratios. Additionally, Detection Transformers incorporate self-attention mechanisms, enabling them to capture global context efficiently. Two ingredients are essential for direct set predictions in detection: (1) a set prediction loss that forces unique matching between predicted and ground truth End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers 5 boxes; (2) an architecture that predicts (in a single pass) a set of objects and models their relation [4].
Also, Figure 3 explains the architecture of DETR in detail. DETR uses a conventional CNN backbone to learn a 2D representation of an input image. The model flattens it and supplements it with a positional encoding before passing it into a transformer encoder. A transformer decoder then takes as input a small fixed number of learned positional embeddings, which we call object queries, and additionally attends to the encoder output. We pass each output embedding of the decoder to a shared feed forward network (FFN) that predicts either a detection (class and bounding box) or a "no object" class [4].
Vision Transformer (ViT) is a model that applies the Transformer architecture to image classification tasks, treating images as sequences of patches. Unlike traditional CNNs, ViT lacks explicit convolutional layers and relies on self-attention mechanisms for global context understanding. In contrast to Detection Transformers (such as DETR), which focuses on object detection, ViT is primarily designed for image classification. ViT's attention-based approach allows it to capture long-range dependencies and relationships within the image, offering a different paradigm for visual information processing compared to both CNNs and object detection-oriented transformers like DETR.
The Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture divides an input image into non-overlapping patches, linearly embeds them, and then treats them as sequences. These patch embeddings are passed through a stack of Transformer encoder blocks, facilitating self-attention mechanisms to capture global relationships. The positional embeddings maintain spatial information. ViT employs a classification head on top of the final sequence output, enabling it to perform image classification tasks effectively without relying on traditional convolutional layers.
The Vision transformer model consists of different variants (Table 1).
In comparing the largest Vision Transformer (ViT) models, ViT-H/14 and ViT-L/16, to state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) like Big Transfer (BiT) and Noisy Student, noteworthy distinctions emerge. ViT-L/16, trained on JFT-300M, outperforms BiT-L on diverse tasks while demanding substantially fewer computational resources for pre-training. The larger ViT-H/14 model further enhances performance, particularly on challenging datasets like ImageNet, CIFAR-100, and VTAB suite. Table 2 presents a comprehensive overview of accuracy and computational efficiency across benchmarks, highlighting ViT models' superior efficiency. Moreover, Figure 5 dissects VTAB performance across different task groups, demonstrating ViT-H/14's superiority over previous methods in Natural and Structured tasks. The study underscores ViT models' efficiency in achieving competitive results with reduced pre-training compute, contributing valuable insights into architecture's impact on performance and computational efficiency in image classification benchmarks.
The study investigates the impact of dataset size on Vision Transformer (ViT) performance through two sets of experiments. Pre-training ViT models on increasingly larger datasets-ImageNet, ImageNet-21k, and JFT-300M reveals that ViT-Large models, when pre-trained on ImageNet, underperform compared to ViT-Base models. However, their performance becomes comparable with ImageNet-21k pre-training and significantly improves with JFT-300M pre-training. Linear few-shot evaluations on ImageNet demonstrate that ViT outperforms ResNets and Hybrid models with larger pre-training datasets, suggesting ViT's effectiveness in capturing relevant patterns directly from data.
The initial linear embedding of RGB values in ViT-L/32 is subject to filters, while the position embeddings in the model exhibit similarity analysis. The tiles in the visual representation [Figure 7] display the cosine similarity between the position embedding of a specific patch, denoted by its row and column, and the position embeddings of all other patches. Moreover, the size of the attended area by each head and the network depth are depicted, with each dot on the visualization representing the mean attention distance across images for one of the 16 heads at a particular layer. This information collectively provides insights into the intricate attention mechanisms and positional relationships within the ViT-L/32 model architecture.
Enhanced Medical Diagnostics
Visual Transformers are transforming medical diagnostics by accurately analyzing medical images like X-rays and MRIs, detecting subtle disease indicators. Their advanced AI algorithms enable early and precise diagnosis, improving treatment outcomes. This technology is vital in identifying complex conditions and enhancing personalized healthcare.
Advancements in Autonomous Systems:
Visual Transformers are crucial in developing sophisticated autonomous vehicles and drones, enhancing safety and efficiency in transportation. Their advanced image processing capabilities enable precise navigation and real-time decision-making, essential for the reliability of these technologies. This innovation is leading the way towards a future of safer, smarter, and more efficient automated transportation systems.
Privacy Concerns
The advanced capabilities of Visual Transformers raise concerns over unauthorized surveillance and data privacy issues, as they can be used for intrusive monitoring, potentially compromising personal privacy and security.
Bias and Ethical Issues
If trained on skewed data, Visual Transformers have the potential to amplify biases, particularly in applications like facial recognition. This can lead to unfair or discriminatory outcomes, challenging the fairness and ethical application of this technology.
Real-time Image Recognition
ViT stands as a cornerstone technology in autonomous vehicles, primarily due to its unparalleled ability in real-time image recognition. It's the technology that enables cars to "see" and "understand" their environment, much like a human driver. By processing visual data in real-time, ViT ensures that autonomous vehicles can navigate safely, recognizing and reacting to the dynamic conditions of the road.
Live Video Feed Analysis: One of ViT's primary roles in autonomous vehicles is to analyze live video feeds from multiple car cameras. This analysis is critical for identifying various elements on the road, such as other vehicles, pedestrians, road signs, and traffic lights.
Understanding Complex Scenes: Beyond mere identification, ViT interprets complex urban and rural street scenes. It's adept at understanding subtle contextual cues, like predicting a pedestrian's intent to cross the road, which is crucial for ensuring safety.
Enhanced Safety and Reliability: By providing a deep and contextual understanding of the surroundings, ViT significantly improves the safety and reliability of autonomous vehicles. It acts as an additional 'set of eyes' that are always vigilant and capable of processing vast amounts of visual information instantaneously.
Adaptability in Various Conditions: ViT equips autonomous vehicles with the ability to adapt to different environmental conditions. Whether it's navigating through a rainy night or adjusting to sudden changes in traffic, ViT ensures that the vehicle is prepared for various scenarios.
While the original paper focuses on transformer models at fixed resolutions, there's a need for comprehensive research on their performance with diverse image resolutions in real-world scenarios. Investigating adaptive scaling strategies, preserving critical information during preprocessing, and understanding the computational efficiency implications are vital for enhancing transformer versatility. Additionally, addressing low-resolution challenges through fine-tuning or architectural adjustments could prove instrumental in applications like surveillance and mobile imaging. This comprehensive approach fills a gap in the original paper, significantly improving the applicability and efficiency of transformer models in image recognition tasks across varied resolutions.
In a proactive pursuit of solutions to the aforementioned challenges, a recent research endeavor has made notable strides. NaViT (Native Resolution ViT [5]) disrupts the conventional practice of resizing images before processing, utilizing Vision Transformer's sequence-based modeling for adaptable handling of arbitrary resolutions and aspect ratios. This innovative approach not only improves training efficiency but also exhibits superior performance across diverse computer vision tasks, signaling a departure from the standard CNN-designed pipeline and showcasing a promising direction for Vision Transformers (ViTs).
The paper innovatively adapts the transformer model, predominantly utilized in NLP tasks, to the realm of image classification, demonstrating its verstatility beyond text-based applications. It introduces a simple but effective method of transforming image patches to linear embeddings, thereby repurposing the transformer architecture for visual data. This signifies a substantial shift in image recognition techniques, highlighting the adaptabulity of transformers to diverse domains
Vision Transformers (ViTs) showcase remarkable competencies, often outperforming advanced CNNs, especially with extensive pre-training on large datasets. This ability to improve with more data hints at ViTs' potential to redefine image recognition standards as data availability escalates.
ViTs maintain a straightforward transformer architecture, which translates to broader applicability across diverse vision tasks. This uniform approach could streamline model training and implementation, suggesting a versatile future for transformers in visual applications.
The paper's detailed experimentation provides a transparent evaluation of ViTs, identifying when they perform best and their comparative drawbacks. This thorough approach not only clarifies ViTs' current standing in image recognition but also lays a foundation for subsequent research enhancements.
The paper oscillates in its perspective on inductive biases, integral to CNNs for recognizing patterns irrespective of their image location. It does not decisively conclude if omitting these biases benefits the transformer, leaving the model's performance across various tasks somewhat ambiguous.
The study introduces a repurposed application of transformers for image recognition, which lacks groundbreaking innovation. This reframing of existing technology into a new context raises questions about the model's novelty and its ability to introduce foundational advancements in the field.
How does the choice of patch size (other than the 16x16 used in the paper) affect the performance of ViT, particularly in terms of feature extraction and model efficiency?
How robust is the ViT model against adversarial attacks compared to traditional CNNs and other state-of-the-art models, especially considering its unique approach to processing images?
Soundess : 4
Presentation: 4
Contribution: 3
Overall: 7
Confidence: 4
The paper innovatively adapts the transformer model, predominantly utilized in NLP tasks, to the realm of image classification, demonstrating its verstatility beyond text-based applications. It introduces a simple but effective method of transforming image patches to linear embeddings, thereby repurposing the transformer architecture for visual data. This signifies a substantial shift in image recognition techniques, highlighting the adaptabulity of transformers to diverse domains
A key advantage of the attention mechanism in Vision Transformers (ViT) is its ability to capture long-range dependencies across the entire image. This global perspective contrasts with the local focus of traditional CNNs, enabling ViTs to better understand and integrate contextual relationships within the image, which is crucial for complex recognition tasks.
The Vision Transformer (ViT) demonstrates strong transfer learning capabilities, with models trained on one task showing quantitatively high performance when adapted to another. For example, a ViT pre-trained on a large dataset like ImageNet often retains high accuracy and precision when fine-tuned for different tasks, showcasing efficient feature retention and adaptability.
Relies heavily on supervised pre-training, unlike models like BERT in NLP which can leverage unlabeled data, potentially limiting its applicability in scenarios with less available labeled data.
One consideration worth noting is that Vision Transformer (ViT) encounters challenges when applied to full images due to its difficulty in scaling to large input resolutions owing to memory constraints.
How does the Vision Transformer (ViT) perform on smaller datasets compared to traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and BiT (ResNet), given its reliance on large-scale data for optimal performance?
Could the authors elaborate on potential approaches and benefits of integrating more extensive self-supervised learning techniques into ViT, similar to how BERT utilizes unlabeled data in NLP?
How does the performance of ViT vary when confronted with diverse resolutions and computational constraints, providing insights into the associated trade-offs and potential benefits?
Soundess : 4
Presentation: 4
Contribution: 3
Overall: 7
Confidence: 5
[1] Léon Bottou and Patrick Gallinari.
A framework for the cooperation of learning algorithms.
Advances in neural information processing systems 3 (1990).
[2] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, Jian Sun. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
[3]
Sasha Targ, Diogo Almeida1, Kevin Lyman. Resnet in Resnet
Generalizing Residual Architectures.
[4]
Nicolas Carion
, Francisco Massa
, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier,
Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
[5]
Mostafa Dehghani, Basil Mustafa, Josip Djolonga, Jonathan Heek, Matthias Minderer, Mathilde Caron,
Andreas Steiner, Joan Puigcerver,
Robert Geirhos, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Avital Oliver, Piotr Padlewski, Alexey Gritsenko, Mario Lučić, Neil Houlsby. : Patch n' Pack: NaViT
Vision Transformer for any Aspect Ratio and Resolution
[6]
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, Illia Polosukhin.
: Attention Is All You Need
Venkat Srinivasa Raghavan
Indhuja Muthu Kumar